Q:
Mike, after being in farming for over two decades what
made you decide to write a mystery novel?
 Milligan:
It had been over 30 years since my days as a writer/editor
for the San Diego Street Journal,
a small newspaper of some renown for its investigative
Michael
Milligan |
reporting.
Q: So, how did you get into farming in the first place?
Milligan:
Although I was raised mostly in suburban San Diego, I
spent my first seven years on a farm in Ohio and come
from a long line of dirt farmers. I launched my own ag
career in the Arkansas Ozarks as a back-to-the-land organic
gardener, then moved into production horticulture—first
as a market gardener and then as a tree farmer.
Q: Did you stick with organic techniques?
Milligan:
I tried to, but as I became more and more commercial, pest control
options
ran out. It was a tough decision, but farming was my income. Either
I used chemicals or I quit.
Q: What gave you the idea for The Pine
Field Killing?
Milligan:
The Alar scare. If you remember, Alar was a chemical used to keep apples from dropping and spoiling
before they could ripen. Activists created a huge
stir by claiming that Alar residues were carcinogenic
to young children and demanded that it
 |
|
Soil ready for replanting with Monterey
pine seedlings. The bare ground is 12 of the
72 acres Mike Milligan managed for Windmill
Christmas Tree Farm. (Any resemblance to fictional
farms is purely co-incidental.)
|
be immediately
banned. They had people so worked up that parents
were calling 911 to ask whether it was safe to pour
apple juice down the drain or if it should be hauled
to a toxic waste dump.
Q: What was your reaction to all that?
Milligan:
Mixed. While I was upset over what I took as an assault
on the tools of my trade, I was worried too. What
if these people were right about the danger of pesticides?
There I was in 100 degree weather, hunched over the
steering wheel of
my tractor, sweltering in a respirator
and plasticized suit,
spraying my trees with a chemical more toxic than
Alar and absorbing thousands of times the dose any consumer ever would. I had to find out if such anti-pesticide claims
were based on solid scientific evidence.
Q: What did you do?
Milligan:
I got busy reading research findings.
Q: And what did you come up with?
Milligan:
I found that despite the activists' political victory
in getting Alar pulled from the market, their science
was flimsy at best.
|
A
BRIEF BIO
Michael Milligan has been an "on-again, off-again" writer
for decades. He was an investigative reporter for the San
Diego Street Journal, a contributing writer for Ramparts and Organic
Gardening magazines and a recent editor of The 3rd
Degree, a newsletter for Mystery Writers of America.
Born on an Ohio farm, Milligan spent his early
childhood happily tromping around barnyards until—much
to his dismay—the family quit farming and moved to suburban
San Diego.
Years later, Milligan—an Army veteran—studied horticulture
and forestry at the University of Arkansas. For almost three
decades, he earned his keep as a market gardener and tree farmer.
In addition to
his training in horticulture and forestry,
Milligan studied fiction writing and
screenwriting at UCLA.
Currently residing
in Southern California, Milligan is working
on his second novel.
|
|
I learned from Dr. Bruce
Ames, head of U.C. Berkeley's biochemistry department,
that we consume ten thousand times more "carcinogens" from
the chemicals
occurring naturally in fruits and vegetables than we do
from any exposure to pesticides, Alar included.
I read the likes of
longtime anti-smoking campaigner and former U.S. Surgeon
General C. Everett Koop saying that modern pesticides
were not only harmless to humans but crucial to sustaining
our health. Without them we would not be able to supply
the abundant fruits and vegetables that are our best defense
against cancer and other diseases.
The message from Nobel
Prize winner Dr. Norman Borlaug was equally clear.
Borlaug, who averted a famine by introducing modern
agricultural techniques to the Third World, said that
without pesticides, wide-spread starvation in underdeveloped
nations would be inevitable.
Q: Didn't this kind of evidence sway the activists?
Milligan:
Hardly. Within a year, there was a ballot initiative in California that
would have effectively banned many pesticides critical to agriculture—including
the only insecticide I had to control spider mites. A few months
without mite control would have destroyed the tree crop into
which I had already invested four years. Once that initiative
got the required number of signatures, I was sweating bullets.
Q: Did the initiative pass?
Milligan:
Despite early poll numbers that made the proposition
look like a shoo-in, it ultimately failed. Since then
I've seen similar scenarios over and over: ill-informed
people taking pot shots at corporate agribusiness and
never hitting anyone but small growers like me.
Q: Was writing The Pine Field Killing a way of

Book available through major outlets
but you can save time and money
by ordering directly from the
publisher |
 |
|
dealing with that angst?
Milligan:
You bet. Once all the political dust settled, I found a certain
therapeutic aspect to puzzling out murder plots while driving my
tractor.
Q: To whom do you compare yourself in mystery fiction?
Milligan:
A hard question. I love the stories and outdoorsy feel of Tony Hillerman's
work and admire Michael Crichton's ability to weave social critique
into his
work—usually without clobbering the reader over
the head. A small part of me goes for the techno in Tom
Clancy, but I enjoy many others such as Michael Connelly,
Martin Cruz Smith and Thomas H. Cook. Certainly, each
has influenced me.
Q: What's your wish for The Pine Field Killing?
Milligan:
I love the escape of a good mystery. I think folks
will find mine a great read. If, in the process, I
can give them a glimpse of the world through a farmer's
eyes, I'll be thrilled.
|